Re: doc fix for pg_stat_activity.backend_type

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: John Naylor <jcnaylor(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: doc fix for pg_stat_activity.backend_type
Date: 2018-11-13 00:08:20
Message-ID: 20181113000820.GB1336@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 09:42:45PM +0700, John Naylor wrote:
> Looks like it. A quick search revealed "parallel worker" and "logical
> replication worker". src/test/modules/ also show "test_shm_mq" and
> "worker_spi", but it seems those don't need to be publicly documented.
> If that sounds right I'll update the patch to include the first two.

Just wondering: do we actually need to include in the docs this list at
all? This is a recipe to forget its update each time a new backend type
is added.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2018-11-13 00:43:24 Re: Copy data to DSA area
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2018-11-13 00:04:57 Re: Removal of unnecessary CommandCounterIncrement() when doing ON COMMIT DELETE ROWS