Re: partitioned indexes and tablespaces

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: partitioned indexes and tablespaces
Date: 2018-11-03 19:24:28
Message-ID: 20181103192428.wlbx5hcxtjn6bjd6@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2018-Nov-03, Robert Haas wrote:

> Well, you've guaranteed that already. Now 11 will be different from
> 11.1, and tables will be different from indexes until somebody goes
> and makes that consistent again.

Nobody is running 11.0 in production. The people using 11.0 are just
testing, and those that run into this behavior have already reported as
an inconvenience, not something to rely on.

> I now wish I hadn't objected to changing the behavior in April. If
> I'd know that the alternative was going to be to change it in
> November, back-patched, two days before a minor release, with more
> people voting against the change than for it, I would have kept my
> mouth shut.

Well, you didn't object to changing index behavior in April. You
objected to a change related to tables. Nobody had noticed this
behavior for indexes.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2018-11-03 19:30:15 Re: partitioned indexes and tablespaces
Previous Message obouda 2018-11-03 19:19:19 Re: backend crash on DELETE, reproducible locally