From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, kevinvan(at)shift(dot)com, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: WIP Patch: Add a function that returns binary JSONB as a bytea |
Date: | 2018-11-02 21:20:30 |
Message-ID: | 20181102212030.rteayub2slrhruda@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2018-11-02 17:02:24 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On 11/02/2018 11:34 AM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> >
> > Binary format consuming applications already have to deal with these
> > kinds of issues. We already expose internal structures in the other
> > functions -- not sure why jsonb is held to a different standard. For
> > other data types where format changes were made, the standard of
> > 'caveat version' was in place to protect the user. For jsonb we
> > decided to implement a version flag within the type itself, which I
> > thought mistake at the time -- better to have a version header in the
> > COPY BINARY if needed.
> >
>
>
> jsonb_send does output a version header, as I pointed out upthread.
That's Merlin's point I think. For reasons I don't quite understand he
doesn't like that. Yes, a global solution would have been prettier than
per-datum version flag, but that obvioulsy wasn't realistic to introduce
around the feature freeze of the version that introduced jsonb.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2018-11-02 22:15:25 | Re: WIP Patch: Add a function that returns binary JSONB as a bytea |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2018-11-02 21:18:16 | Re: WIP Patch: Add a function that returns binary JSONB as a bytea |