Re: Should pg 11 use a lot more memory building an spgist index?

From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, akorotkov(at)postgresql(dot)org, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Should pg 11 use a lot more memory building an spgist index?
Date: 2018-11-02 21:01:34
Message-ID: 20181102210134.GA9976@wolff.to
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

I see that a fix got committed. Thanks!
I'll double check it after the point release comes out (which looks like it
will be next week) and let you know if there is still a problem.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Aleš Zelený 2018-11-03 01:22:03 Logical replication hangs up.
Previous Message James A. Robinson 2018-11-02 14:05:35 Re: Working around, or with, bitmap heap scan?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2018-11-02 21:02:24 Re: WIP Patch: Add a function that returns binary JSONB as a bytea
Previous Message Nikolay Shaplov 2018-11-02 20:52:13 Re: [PATCH][PROPOSAL] Add enum releation option type