| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Darafei "Komяpa" Praliaskouski <me(at)komzpa(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Paul Ramsey <pramsey(at)cleverelephant(dot)ca>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Parallel threads in query |
| Date: | 2018-11-01 19:24:25 |
| Message-ID: | 20181101192425.dal56xii46uvwdo6@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2018-11-01 09:17:56 -1000, Darafei "Komяpa" Praliaskouski wrote:
> So, do I understand correctly that I need to start a parallel worker that
> does nothing for each thread I launch to consume the parallel worker limit?
No, I don't think that'd be reasonable. I think what we're saying is
that there's no way to reasonably use the parallel worker limit as the
limitation for what you're trying to do. You need custom infrastructure.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2018-11-01 19:32:39 | Re: Parallel threads in query |
| Previous Message | Darafei Komяpa Praliaskouski | 2018-11-01 19:17:56 | Re: Parallel threads in query |