Re: pg_promote not marked as parallel-restricted in pg_proc.dat

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_promote not marked as parallel-restricted in pg_proc.dat
Date: 2018-10-29 09:03:49
Message-ID: 20181029090349.GM14242@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 09:41:08AM +0100, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> I think that the question if pg_promote allows a parallel plan or not
> is mostly academic, but the two definitions should be kept in sync.

It seems to me that the presence of the trigger file written in $PGDATA
means that the function should be restricted.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexey Kondratov 2018-10-29 09:09:21 Re: [Patch] pg_rewind: options to use restore_command from recovery.conf or command line
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2018-10-29 09:03:45 Re: [HACKERS] Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers, take 2