Re: Should pg 11 use a lot more memory building an spgist index?

From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>
To: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Should pg 11 use a lot more memory building an spgist index?
Date: 2018-10-25 02:41:44
Message-ID: 20181025024144.GA17798@wolff.to
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 20:23:14 -0500,
Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> wrote:
>While reloading a database cluster to move from 10.5 to 11, I'm
>getting out of memory crashes that I did see when doing reloads on pg
>10.
>The statement flagged in the log is this:
>2018-10-23 16:44:34.815 CDT [126839] STATEMENT: ALTER TABLE ONLY public.iplocation
> ADD CONSTRAINT overlap EXCLUDE USING spgist (network WITH &&);
>
>iplocation has 4398722 rows.

I'm trying to reproduce this on my desktop but so far it isn't producing
the same issue. The database is still loading after 9 hours, but it looks
like it got past the point where the problem index was created. (I'm not
sure how to check if the index has really finished being created, but \d
shows it as existing.)

I'll know better tomorrow.

My workstation is using the Fedora version of postgresql 11 which might
have some relevant difference from the pgdg version for rhel7. I still
have a number of things I can try, but they might take significant time
to run and I might not get a reasonable test case for a while.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Fletcher 2018-10-25 03:22:39 Re: Oracle vs PG
Previous Message Pratik Parikh 2018-10-25 00:21:47 Compile and build portable postgresql for mac

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2018-10-25 03:42:37 Re: [PATCH] Tab complete EXECUTE FUNCTION for CREATE (EVENT) TRIGGER
Previous Message Chapman Flack 2018-10-25 02:26:31 Re: Re: Question about xmloption and pg_restore