Re: [HACKERS] removing abstime, reltime, tinterval.c, spi/timetravel

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] removing abstime, reltime, tinterval.c, spi/timetravel
Date: 2018-10-12 15:58:21
Message-ID: 20181012155821.ce5jlhyniqeemrjh@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2018-10-12 11:23:30 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Anything that runs at the time we do the regression tests has problems, from
> my POV. If we run the drop commands then upgrading these types to a target
> <= 11 isn't tested.

I'm asking again, what exactly do we test by having these types in the
dump? They're bog standard types, there's nothing new for pg_dump to
test with them. No weird typmod rules, no weird parse-time type mapping,
nothing?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sergei Kornilov 2018-10-12 16:15:22 Re: Continue work on changes to recovery.conf API
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-10-12 15:48:51 Re: [HACKERS] removing abstime, reltime, tinterval.c, spi/timetravel