Re: Refactor textToQualifiedNameList()

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
Subject: Re: Refactor textToQualifiedNameList()
Date: 2018-10-11 01:01:05
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 09:45:22AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2018-Oct-10, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 09:54:12AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>> The committer of such a change will get a lot of flak for changing the
>>> #include requirements for code that calls that function, though.
>> So the patch has been switched to rejected...
> I know -- I'm just disagreeing with that.

The point of moving stringToQualifiedNameList out of regproc.c to
varlena.c is actually a good one, if we don't add the extra palloc
overhead. Now I suspect that any change of header makes plugin
maintainers unhappy, and I can see this routine extensively used on
github, like pipelineDB or such.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2018-10-11 01:29:07 Re: [HACKERS] Optional message to user when terminating/cancelling backend
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2018-10-10 23:57:20 Re: Postgres 11 release notes