Re: Multiple primary key on partition table?

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Multiple primary key on partition table?
Date: 2018-10-04 14:55:03
Message-ID: 20181004145503.gtuj5eritwnomz4o@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2018-Oct-01, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 11:20 AM amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > Here is the complete patch proposes the aforesaid fix with regression test.
>
> Thanks, This worked for me.

Yeah, looks good to me, pushed. I added one more regression test to
ensure that the PRIMARY KEY clause in the partition is still accepted if
the parent does not have one.

Thanks

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-10-04 15:22:29 Re: Segfault when creating partition with a primary key and sql_drop trigger exists
Previous Message Geoff Winkless 2018-10-04 14:46:26 Re: Poor plan when using EXISTS in the expression list