| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Matheus de Oliveira <matioli(dot)matheus(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Add support for ON UPDATE/DELETE actions on ALTER CONSTRAINT |
| Date: | 2018-10-02 06:40:14 |
| Message-ID: | 20181002064014.GA17642@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 12:03:17AM -0300, Matheus de Oliveira wrote:
> You are correct. I have made a test that tries all combinations of ALTER
> CONSTRAINT ON UPDATE/DELETE ACTION, but it caused a really huge output. I
> have changed that to a simple DO block, and still trying all possibilities
> but now I just verify if the ALTER matches the same definition on
> pg_trigger of a constraint that was created with the target action already,
> seems simpler and work for any change.
>
> Please, let me know if you all think any change should be made on this
> patch.
The last patch set does not apply, so this is moved to next CF, waiting
on author as new status.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fabien COELHO | 2018-10-02 06:43:04 | Re: [HACKERS] pgbench - allow to store select results into variables |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-10-02 06:37:06 | Re: [HACKERS] Can ICU be used for a database's default sort order? |