Re: [PATCH] Add support for ON UPDATE/DELETE actions on ALTER CONSTRAINT

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Matheus de Oliveira <matioli(dot)matheus(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add support for ON UPDATE/DELETE actions on ALTER CONSTRAINT
Date: 2018-10-02 06:40:14
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 12:03:17AM -0300, Matheus de Oliveira wrote:
> You are correct. I have made a test that tries all combinations of ALTER
> CONSTRAINT ON UPDATE/DELETE ACTION, but it caused a really huge output. I
> have changed that to a simple DO block, and still trying all possibilities
> but now I just verify if the ALTER matches the same definition on
> pg_trigger of a constraint that was created with the target action already,
> seems simpler and work for any change.
> Please, let me know if you all think any change should be made on this
> patch.

The last patch set does not apply, so this is moved to next CF, waiting
on author as new status.

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabien COELHO 2018-10-02 06:43:04 Re: [HACKERS] pgbench - allow to store select results into variables
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2018-10-02 06:37:06 Re: [HACKERS] Can ICU be used for a database's default sort order?