Re: [HACKERS] Secondary index access optimizations

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Secondary index access optimizations
Date: 2018-10-02 04:31:03
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 11:43:09AM +0300, Konstantin Knizhnik wrote:
> Looks like this qual is considered for choosing optimal path before it is
> removed from list of quals in set_append_rel_size.

Hm... The latest reviews have not been addressed yet, so I have marked
this as returned with feedback.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2018-10-02 04:35:45 Re: [WIP PATCH] Index scan offset optimisation using visibility map
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2018-10-02 04:26:37 Re: SerializeParamList vs machines with strict alignment