Re: jsonpath

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Nikita Glukhov <n(dot)gluhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Stas Kelvich <s(dot)kelvich(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Oleg Bartunov <obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: jsonpath
Date: 2018-10-02 02:33:17
Message-ID: 20181002023317.GI11712@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Sep 08, 2018 at 02:21:27AM +0300, Nikita Glukhov wrote:
> Attached 18th version of the patches rebased onto the current master.

Nikita, this version fails to apply, as 0004 has conflicts with some
regression tests. Could you rebase? I am moving the patch to CF
2018-11, waiting for your input.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2018-10-02 02:42:20 Re: Changing the autovacuum launcher scheduling; oldest table first algorithm
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2018-10-02 02:27:30 Re: [HACKERS] Small improvement to compactify_tuples