Re: [HACKERS] SERIALIZABLE with parallel query

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SERIALIZABLE with parallel query
Date: 2018-10-01 07:17:57
Message-ID: 20181001071757.GK11712@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 04:50:40PM -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> I will spend a few more days in testing and review, but figured I
> should pass along "first impressions" now.

Kevin, it seems that this patch is pending on your input. I have moved
this patch to next CF for now.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2018-10-01 07:19:58 Re: Relations being opened without any lock whatever
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2018-10-01 07:15:42 Re: Hash Joins vs. Bloom Filters / take 2