Re: test_pg_dump missing cleanup actions

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: test_pg_dump missing cleanup actions
Date: 2018-09-27 22:48:05
Message-ID: 20180927224805.GA1500@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 09:20:15AM -0700, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Attached is a patch with more comments about the intents of the test
> suite, and the separate issue pointed out by Tom fixed. It seems to me
> that actually checking the contents of pg_init_privs would improve the
> reason why the test exists.. I would welcome input about this last
> point.

So, Stephen, any input to offer? This has been around for the last
three weeks. I am tracking this thread in the section for older bugs in
v11 open items.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2018-09-27 22:49:26 Re: test_pg_dump missing cleanup actions
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-09-27 22:37:57 Re: Obtaining a more consistent view definition when a UNION subquery contains undecorated constants