On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 12:05:42PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> Actually I think it *is* useful to do it like this, because then the
>> user knows to fix the netmsg.dll problem so that they can continue to
>> investigate the winsock problem. If we don't report the secondary error
>> message, how are users going to figure out how to fix the problem?
>
> OK, I'm fine with doing it like that if people want it.
+1.
--
Michael