Re: Changing the setting of wal_sender_timeout per standby

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, 'Masahiko Sawada' <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Changing the setting of wal_sender_timeout per standby
Date: 2018-09-23 04:09:38
Message-ID: 20180923040938.3ucezhsz57uwfx3l@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2018-09-22 15:27:24 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 06:26:19AM +0000, Tsunakawa, Takayuki wrote:
> > Agreed.
>
> Okay, I have pushed the patch with all your suggestions included.

Have there been discussions about the security effects of this change?
Previously the server admin could control the timeout, which could
affect things like syncrep, after this it's not possible anymore. I
*think* that's ok, but it should be discussed.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2018-09-23 04:14:00 Re: Code of Conduct plan
Previous Message Mark G 2018-09-23 01:02:18 Missing const in DSA.