Re: transction_timestamp() inside of procedures

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: transction_timestamp() inside of procedures
Date: 2018-09-23 00:27:24
Message-ID: 20180923002724.GA9574@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 06:35:02PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Does the SQL standard have anything to say about CURRENT_TIMESTAMP in
> procedures? Do we need another function that does advance on procedure
> commit?

I found a section in the SQL standards that talks about it, but I don't
understand it. Can I quote the paragraph here?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark G 2018-09-23 01:02:18 Missing const in DSA.
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2018-09-23 00:17:21 Re: testing pg_dump against very old versions