|From:||Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>|
|To:||Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>|
|Cc:||Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>|
|Subject:||Re: Indicate anti-wraparound autovacuum in log_autovacuum_min_duration|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 05:36:31PM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> It would be useful if we have a number of the options autovacuum
> workers could use but since there are only 2 I'm not sure we need the
Looking at what Sergei has proposed upthread again, using a
comma-separated list of options may be more painful for translators as
such lists really depend on the language, so I would be fine to commit
what has been added.
One last point though: we use anti-wraparound in already five places in
the docs, still I have sympathy for "to prevent wraparound" as well.
The brackets look rather useless to me, wouldn't it be better to remove
them? By doing so the longest message becomes:
"automatic aggressive vacuum to prevent wraparound of table blah.blah"
|Next Message||Michael Paquier||2018-09-13 03:59:36||Re: [HACKERS] Cutting initdb's runtime (Perl question embedded)|
|Previous Message||Michael Paquier||2018-09-13 03:38:37||Re: review printing ecpg program version|