Re: A strange GiST error message or fillfactor of GiST build

From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us
Cc: bruce(at)momjian(dot)us, x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru, a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: A strange GiST error message or fillfactor of GiST build
Date: 2018-09-13 06:29:27
Message-ID: 20180913.152927.207382453.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello.

At Fri, 07 Sep 2018 16:12:29 -0400, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote in <19695(dot)1536351149(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > So, are we going to output a notice if a non-100% fill factor is
> > specified?
>
> I would not think that's helpful.

I agree. My understanding is that:

It has'nt been worked as expected anyway thus we ignore it
instead of removing not to break existing setup, and with silence
not to surprise someone using it believing it works.

regards.

--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2018-09-13 06:47:26 Re: Unused argument from execute_sql_string()
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2018-09-13 06:28:00 Re: simplify index tuple descriptor initialization