Folks,
The EOLs listed in the table aren't super specific looking forward.
https://www.postgresql.org/support/versioning/
Would it be OK to name the (planned) release date of the final minor
release in that table?
I'm asking because I've had some complaints from people who assume, I
believe reasonably, that that table represents the actual EOL and not
the current meaning of, "the date past which the date of the next
point release is planned to come out."
What say?
Best,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate