Re: Bug fix for glibc broke freebsd build in REL_11_STABLE

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Victor Wagner <vitus(at)wagner(dot)pp(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bug fix for glibc broke freebsd build in REL_11_STABLE
Date: 2018-09-04 20:25:21
Message-ID: 20180904202521.urjfs5oic74ybnke@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2018-09-04 16:13:45 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Victor Wagner <vitus(at)wagner(dot)pp(dot)ru> writes:
> > Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> пишет:
> >> (I was testing PG HEAD, not the 11 branch, but I don't see a reason
> >> to think that'd make a difference.)
>
> > Alas, it does. First thing I've done after discovering this bug, it is
> > to look if it exists in master. And master passes this test on the same
> > machine where problem was discovered.
>
> Oh really ... I'll go try again. Now I agree with Andres, we need
> to understand *exactly* what is failing here rather than guess.
>
> My first thought was that the C99 changeover might explain the
> difference. But clang doesn't require any special switch to select
> C99 mode, so in principle that should've made no difference to clang
> builds.

Thomas and I are sitting in a cafe and are trying to figure out what's
going on...

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2018-09-04 20:30:12 test_pg_dump missing cleanup actions
Previous Message Andrew Gierth 2018-09-04 20:16:05 Re: Bug fix for glibc broke freebsd build in REL_11_STABLE