Re: Dimension limit in contrib/cube (dump/restore hazard?)

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Dimension limit in contrib/cube (dump/restore hazard?)
Date: 2018-08-30 18:04:11
Message-ID: 20180830180411.GD15446@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 02:28:20PM +0300, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> In general looks good for me. Personally I get tired with cube.out
> and cube_2.out. They are different with only few checks involving
> scientific notation. But all the patches touching cube regression
> tests should update both cube.out and cube_2.out. I propose to split
> scientific notation checks into separate test.

+1.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2018-08-30 18:06:18 Re: Online verification of checksums
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2018-08-30 18:04:09 Re: B-tree cache prefetches