Re: [HACKERS] Proposal to add work_mem option to postgres_fdw module

From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz
Cc: robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, noriyoshi(dot)shinoda(at)hpe(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Proposal to add work_mem option to postgres_fdw module
Date: 2018-08-30 10:24:45
Message-ID: 20180830.192445.216279772.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At Mon, 27 Aug 2018 19:38:19 -0700, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote in <20180828023819(dot)GA29157(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 02:34:31PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > I like the direction of your thinking, but it seems to me that this
> > would cause a problem if you want to set search_path=foo,bar.
>
> proconfig already handles such cases, that's what I was coming at. We
> could reuse most of what it does, no?

IIUC, proconfig is a text array, options is a text, and the
options psql-option is in the format of '-cvar=val -cvar=val...'.
Thus I think we still need something to convert them.

As an experiment, just with the following mod:

contrib/postgres_fdw/option.c
/* Hide debug options, as well as settings we override internally. */
- if (strchr(lopt->dispchar, 'D') ||
+ if ((strchr(lopt->dispchar, 'D') &&
+ strcmp(lopt->keyword, "options") != 0) ||
strcmp(lopt->keyword, "fallback_application_name") == 0 ||

and the following setup:

=# alter server sv1
options (set options '-csearch_path=\\"hoge,hage\\"\\ -cwork_mem=16MB');

actually works. Converting array representation into the
commandline options format shown above internally might make it
look better a bit..

=# alter server sv1
options (set options '{"search_path=\"hoge,hage\"",work_mem=16MB}');

regards.

--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2018-08-30 10:42:42 Re: Reopen logfile on SIGHUP
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-08-30 10:18:13 Re: pg_verify_checksums -d option (was: Re: pg_verify_checksums -r option)