Re: Would it be possible to have parallel archiving?

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers mailing list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Would it be possible to have parallel archiving?
Date: 2018-08-28 21:44:19
Message-ID: 20180828214419.GM29157@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 05:20:10PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Absolutely. External processes shouldn't be changing the files written
> out and managed by the core system.

+1. Archiving commands should not mess up directly with the contents
the backend is managing.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2018-08-28 21:49:01 Re: Some pgq table rewrite incompatibility with logical decoding?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-08-28 21:43:48 Re: some pg_dump query code simplification