| From: | hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers mailing list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Would it be possible to have parallel archiving? |
| Date: | 2018-08-28 06:02:21 |
| Message-ID: | 20180828060221.x33gokifqi3csjj4@depesz.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
I'm in a situation where we quite often generate more WAL than we can
archive. The thing is - archiving takes long(ish) time but it's
multi-step process and includes talking to remote servers over network.
I tested that simply by running archiving in parallel I can easily get
2-3 times higher throughput.
But - I'd prefer to keep postgresql knowing what is archived, and what
not, so I can't do the parallelization on my own.
So, the question is: is it technically possible to have parallel
archivization, and would anyone be willing to work on it (sorry, my
c skills are basically none, so I can't realistically hack it myself)
Best regards,
depesz
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alexander Kukushkin | 2018-08-28 06:21:57 | Re: BUG #15346: Replica fails to start after the crash |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2018-08-28 05:45:50 | Re: First steps to being a contributer |