Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c)

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Sandeep Thakkar <sandeep(dot)thakkar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c)
Date: 2018-08-24 17:02:29
Message-ID: 20180824170229.lm7dkcvz7nfb2wxs@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

On 2018-08-24 12:10:34 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > I'd like to change it so it doesn't enforce C89 compliance across the
> > board, but instead enforces the relevant standard. For that I'd need to
> > change CFLAGS per-branch in the buildfarm. Is that possible already? Do
> > I need two different config files?
>
> I just did that on dromedary, with a stanza like this at the bottom:
>
> if ($branch eq 'HEAD' or $branch ge 'REL_12')
> {
> $conf{config_env}->{CC} = 'ccache gcc -std=c99';
> }
> else
> {
> $conf{config_env}->{CC} = 'ccache gcc -ansi';
> }

Thanks, did something similar, mylodon should become green soon. I kinda
was hoping that CFLAGS would directly accept version specific like some
other vars directly...

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bossart, Nathan 2018-08-24 17:30:01 Re: Improve behavior of concurrent ANALYZE/VACUUM
Previous Message Ashutosh Sharma 2018-08-24 16:24:15 Re: table_privileges view under information_schema doesn't show privileges on materialized views

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2018-08-24 18:09:09 Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-08-24 16:10:34 Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c)