Re: partitioning - changing a slot's descriptor is expensive

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: partitioning - changing a slot's descriptor is expensive
Date: 2018-08-20 11:21:03
Message-ID: 20180820112103.tdhijyvrfd4shje3@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2018-08-20 16:40:17 +0530, Amit Khandekar wrote:
> On 20 August 2018 at 14:45, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> > By the way, I think it might be a good idea to
> > try to merge this patch with the effort in the following thread.
> >
> > * Reduce partition tuple routing overheads *
> > https://commitfest.postgresql.org/19/1690/
>
> Yes. I guess, whichever commits later needs to be rebased on the earlier one.

I think I'd rather keep this patch separate, it's pretty simple, so we
should be able to commit it fairly soon.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2018-08-20 11:24:02 Re: partitioning - changing a slot's descriptor is expensive
Previous Message Amit Khandekar 2018-08-20 11:15:49 Re: Slotification of partition tuple conversion