| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] GnuTLS support |
| Date: | 2018-08-20 03:13:32 |
| Message-ID: | 20180820031332.GF7403@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 02:13:51PM -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> In the thread about Secure Transport we agreed to move the consideration
> of new SSL libraries to PG12.
>
> Here is my current patch, after all the refactorings.
>
> The status is that it works fine and could be used.
>
> There are two failures in the SSL tests that I cannot explain. The
> tests are for some rather obscure configurations, so the changed
> behaviors are not obviously wrong, perhaps legitimate implementation
> differences. But someone wrote those tests with a purpose (probably),
> so we should have some kind of explanation for the regressions.
Patch v6 of this thread is failing to apply. Could you rebase?
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2018-08-20 03:21:07 | Re: [FEATURE PATCH] pg_stat_statements with plans (v02) |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2018-08-20 02:55:38 | Re: [FEATURE PATCH] pg_stat_statements with plans (v02) |