Re: docs: note ownership requirement for refreshing materialized views

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Dian Fay <dian(dot)m(dot)fay(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: docs: note ownership requirement for refreshing materialized views
Date: 2018-08-17 02:36:32
Message-ID: 20180817023632.GC1693@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 09:36:29AM -0400, Dian Fay wrote:
> Fair enough! Here's a new version.

Thanks, pushed. Instead of putting the new sentence in the "Notes"
section, I have added it in the "Description" section, which is more
consistent with other commands, like DROP MATERIALIZED VIEW, etc.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2018-08-17 02:39:11 Re: Problem with OpenSCG downloads
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2018-08-17 02:21:42 Re: Improve behavior of concurrent ANALYZE/VACUUM