| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c |
| Date: | 2018-08-16 12:30:50 |
| Message-ID: | 20180816123050.2hk6ppwe2ij3dxpg@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
Hi,
On 2018-08-16 14:26:07 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 16/08/2018 13:18, Andres Freund wrote:
> > checking for ccache gcc option to accept ISO C99... unsupported
> >
> > I suspect that's because of the '-ansi' flag in CFLAGS, not because
> > the compiler is incapable of actually supporting C99.
>
> -ansi is equivalent to -std=c90. If we make the switch, the build farm
> configuration should just probably replace -ansi with -std=c99.
Right. I just hadn't checked the addition of -std=c99 doesn't override
the -ansi. Presumably just an ordering thing.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2018-08-16 12:54:17 | Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2018-08-16 12:28:25 | Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2018-08-16 12:54:17 | Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2018-08-16 12:28:25 | Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c |