Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c

From: Nico Williams <nico(at)cryptonector(dot)com>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c
Date: 2018-08-16 02:57:46
Message-ID: 20180816025744.GA16780@localhost
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

There's also clang on Windows, which VS apparently supports. With clang
on Windows PG could even make use of GCC/Clang C extensions :^)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Etsuro Fujita 2018-08-16 03:00:16 Re: Expression errors with "FOR UPDATE" and postgres_fdw with partition wise join enabled.
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-08-16 02:08:05 Re: Improve behavior of concurrent TRUNCATE

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2018-08-16 08:41:34 Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2018-08-16 00:24:47 Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c