Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c
Date: 2018-08-15 21:49:31
Message-ID: 20180815214931.vlwsz4s55enbppna@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

Hi,

On 2018-08-15 15:57:43 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I'd always thought this was only in C++. This alone might be a sufficient
> reason to drop C89 compiler support ...

It's also IIRC reasonably widely supported from before C99. So, for the
sake of designated initializers, for loop scoping, snprintf, let's do
this in master?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2018-08-15 21:52:17 Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2018-08-15 21:47:51 Re: Stored procedures and out parameters

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2018-08-15 21:52:17 Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-08-15 19:57:43 Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c