Re: Code of Conduct plan

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Code of Conduct plan
Date: 2018-08-15 19:22:10
Message-ID: 20180815192210.GI3326@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

Greetings,

* Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> Unless there are substantial objections, or nontrivial changes as a result
> of this round of comments, we anticipate making the CoC official as of
> July 1 2018.

We seem to be a bit past that timeline... Do we have any update on when
this will be moving forward?

Or did I miss something?

Thanks!

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2018-08-15 19:29:43 Re: Code of Conduct plan
Previous Message Nikolay Samokhvalov 2018-08-06 00:29:21 PostgreSQL is in Top-5 most popular technologies mentioned in HN startups job postings

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2018-08-15 19:28:38 Re: How to revoke privileged from PostgreSQL's superuser
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2018-08-15 18:09:10 Re: moving data to from ms sql server via SSIS

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2018-08-15 19:29:43 Re: Code of Conduct plan
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2018-08-15 19:21:30 Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2018-08-15 19:29:43 Re: Code of Conduct plan
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2018-08-15 19:21:30 Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c