| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net |
| Cc: | Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com>, Shay Rojansky <roji(at)roji(dot)org>, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Stored procedures and out parameters |
| Date: | 2018-08-14 17:30:19 |
| Message-ID: | 20180814173019.22cqxpk6v6c6fomo@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2018-08-12 08:51:28 +0100, Shay Rojansky wrote:
> Peter, Tom,
>
> Would it be possible for you to review the following two questions? Some
> assertions have been made in this thread about the new stored procedures
> (support for dynamic and multiple resultsets) whose compatibility with the
> current PostgreSQL protocol are unclear to me as a client driver
> maintainer... Some clarification would really help.
I've not yet discussed this with the rest of the RMT, but to me it
sounds like we should treat this an open item for the release. We
shouldn't have the wire protocol do something nonsensical and then do
something different in the next release.
- Andres
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2018-08-14 17:36:56 | Re: libpq should not look up all host addresses at once |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2018-08-14 17:18:45 | Re: Pre-v11 appearances of the word "procedure" in v11 docs |