Re: Temporary tables prevent autovacuum, leading to XID wraparound

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Temporary tables prevent autovacuum, leading to XID wraparound
Date: 2018-08-14 16:23:57
Message-ID: 20180814162357.GA5316@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 02:15:07PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> If writing an OID were not atomic, the assignment would be really
> dangerous. I don't think your proposed update is good.

OK, I am withdrawing this one then.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2018-08-14 16:53:32 Re: Temporary tables prevent autovacuum, leading to XID wraparound
Previous Message Robert Haas 2018-08-14 16:18:56 Re: Repeatable Read Isolation in SQL running via background worker