Re: Improve behavior of concurrent TRUNCATE

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Improve behavior of concurrent TRUNCATE
Date: 2018-08-10 16:30:21
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 05:55:54PM +0000, Bossart, Nathan wrote:
> On 8/9/18, 11:31 AM, "Michael Paquier" <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>> Thanks, I have updated the patch as you suggested. Any more
>> improvements to it that you can foresee?
> Looks good to me.

Okay, pushed to HEAD. Now remains the cases for VACUUM and we will be
good. I still need to look more deeply at the last patch sent..

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-08-10 16:36:00 Re: libpq should append auth failures, not overwrite
Previous Message Andres Freund 2018-08-10 15:37:26 Re: Constraint documentation