From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, postgres(at)kellerer(dot)name, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Document the limit on the number of parameters |
Date: | 2018-08-08 03:01:49 |
Message-ID: | 20180808030149.GE27724@tamriel.snowman.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Greetings Tom,
* Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> > * Bruce Momjian (bruce(at)momjian(dot)us) wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 01:25:08PM +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> >>> The backend protocol limits the number of parameters that can be passed for
> >>> a prepared statement to 32767 (2 byte signed integer).
>
> >> Uh, is this something people will care about?
>
> > Seems like a limitation in the backend protocol should probably be
> > documented in the backend protocol section of the docs..
>
> It is: the definition of the Bind message format says that the parameter
> count is an int16.
>
> The question is whether this deserves to be cross-referenced from
> elsewhere. I agree with Bruce that it seems unlikely to be helpful.
Ah, I read the original poster as saying that it wasn't in the protocol
docs. If it's there already then I agree, that's sufficient.
Thanks!
Stephen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | PG Doc comments form | 2018-08-08 09:16:24 | dblink_error_message return value |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2018-08-08 02:59:04 | Re: Document the limit on the number of parameters |