Re: Online enabling of checksums

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Online enabling of checksums
Date: 2018-08-01 17:43:24
Message-ID: 20180801174324.2d2x4in7w76wtjnk@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2018-08-01 10:34:55 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Lastly, I think Alvaro has a point with the incremental development and I
> also think some others on this thread need to, "show me the patch" instead
> of being armchair directors of development.

Oh, FFS. I pointed out the issue that led to the restart being
introduced (reminder, in the committed but then reverted version that
didn't exist). I explained how the much less intrusive version would
work. I think it's absurd to describe that as "armchair directors of
development".

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2018-08-01 17:44:07 Re: Expression errors with "FOR UPDATE" and postgres_fdw with partition wise join enabled.
Previous Message Jonathan S. Katz 2018-08-01 17:42:29 Re: Memory leak with CALL to Procedure with COMMIT.