Re: Online enabling of checksums

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Online enabling of checksums
Date: 2018-08-01 16:39:43
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2018-08-01 12:36:13 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> This patchset is weird because it is perhaps our first case of trying to
> change the state of the server while it is running. We just don't have
> an established protocol for how to orchestrate that, so we are limping
> along toward a solution.

There's a number of GUCs that do this? Even in related areas,
cf. full_page_writes.


Andres Freund

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2018-08-01 16:45:27 Re: Online enabling of checksums
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2018-08-01 16:36:13 Re: Online enabling of checksums