| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Online enabling of checksums |
| Date: | 2018-07-31 23:05:23 |
| Message-ID: | 20180731230523.yhuiqltjpf5il6ya@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2018-07-31 18:56:29 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> In the spirit of supporting incremental development, I think it's quite
> sensible to get the current thing done, then see what it takes to get
> the next thing done. Each is an improvement on its own merits. And it
> doesn't have to be made by the same people.
I just don't buy this. An earlier version of this feature was committed
to v11 without the restart, over objections. There's now extra state in
the control file to support the restart based system, there's extra
tests, extra docs. And it'd not be much code to just make it work
without the restart. The process around this patchset is just plain
weird.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2018-07-31 23:08:05 | Re: pg_upgrade from 9.4 to 10.4 |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2018-07-31 22:56:29 | Re: Online enabling of checksums |