| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, hlinnaka <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Problem while setting the fpw with SIGHUP |
| Date: | 2018-07-28 23:19:11 |
| Message-ID: | 20180728231911.GB1471@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 07:10:24PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> I have just responded to your first patch (0001). Can you once again
> summarize what the 0002 exactly accomplishes? I think one of the
> goals is to fix the original problem reported in this thread and other
> is you have found the concurrency issue. Is it possible to have
> separate patches for those or you think they are interrelated and
> needs to be fixed together?
That would be nice. The last time I read this thread I have been rather
confused about what was being discussed, what were the set of problems,
and what was being fixed. Speaking of which, this is one of the bugfix
patches I wanted to look at once I have untanggled the autovacuum one
for temporary relations and the DOS issues with lock lookups.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fabien COELHO | 2018-07-28 23:59:00 | Re: Removing useless \. at the end of copy in pgbench |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-07-28 22:59:52 | Re: add verbosity to pg_basebackup for sync |