Re: Bugs in TOAST handling, OID assignment and redo recovery

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bugs in TOAST handling, OID assignment and redo recovery
Date: 2018-07-23 19:13:15
Message-ID: 20180723191315.xmquuzwnacicbeqo@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2018-Apr-11, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> On 4/10/18 06:29, Pavan Deolasee wrote:
> > One of our 2ndQuadrant support customers recently reported a sudden rush
> > of TOAST errors post a crash recovery, nearly causing an outage. Most
> > errors read like this:
> >
> > ERROR: unexpected chunk number 0 (expected 1) for toast value nnnn
>
> While researching this, I found that the terminology in this code is
> quite inconsistent. It talks about chunks ids, chunk indexes, chunk
> numbers, etc. seemingly interchangeably. The above error is actually
> about the chunk_seq, not about the chunk_id, as one might think.
>
> The attached patch is my attempt to clean this up a bit. Thoughts?

I didn't review your patch carefully, but +1 on the idea. By all means
let's not forget this for pg12.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nico Williams 2018-07-23 19:15:34 Re: How can we submit code patches that implement our (pending) patents?
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2018-07-23 19:12:03 Re: How can we submit code patches that implement our (pending) patents?