Re: Should contrib modules install .h files?

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Should contrib modules install .h files?
Date: 2018-07-23 01:18:28
Message-ID: 20180723011828.kxxiexcoxrvopgft@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2018-07-23 02:02:51 +0100, Andrew Gierth wrote:
> >>>>> "Michael" == Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
>
> >> No response to my followup to you in 2+ weeks. Last call?
>
> Michael> FWIW, I don't have any objections with experimenting on HEAD,
> Michael> but I would vote for letting 11 out of this.
>
> Why?

Because that's the default assumption when considerint to committ a new
feature to a feature frozen branch? I don't really have a strong
feeling about this specific case either way, personally. But it's still
the default assumption.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tsunakawa, Takayuki 2018-07-23 01:31:57 RE: [bug fix] Produce a crash dump before main() on Windows
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2018-07-23 01:03:57 Re: JIT breaks PostGIS