Re: Should contrib modules install .h files?

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: Should contrib modules install .h files?
Date: 2018-07-23 00:51:33
Message-ID: 20180723005133.GC2854@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 01:48:21AM +0100, Andrew Gierth wrote:
> >>>>> "Peter" == Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>
>>> Anyone have any objection to putting this into 11beta if it works,
>>> as well as 12devel?
>
> Peter> Yes, I have expressed concerns about this approach elsewhere in
> Peter> this thread.
>
> No response to my followup to you in 2+ weeks. Last call?

FWIW, I don't have any objections with experimenting on HEAD, but I
would vote for letting 11 out of this.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Gierth 2018-07-23 01:02:51 Re: Should contrib modules install .h files?
Previous Message Andrew Gierth 2018-07-23 00:48:21 Re: Should contrib modules install .h files?