Re: Possible bug in logical replication.

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Arseny Sher <a(dot)sher(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, konstantin knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Possible bug in logical replication.
Date: 2018-07-19 04:42:05
Message-ID: 20180719044205.GI3411@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 12:38:53AM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2018-Jul-19, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> I am fine either way if you want to have the last call. So please feel
>> free to choose what you prefer here. That's no big deal.
>
> Okay. You want to push it, or shall I?

It seems to me that you are on it more than I. So please go ahead.
Thanks for asking.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2018-07-19 04:58:30 Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Keep one postmaster monitoring pipe per process
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2018-07-19 04:40:44 Re: Background worker/idle sessions and caching