Re: Refactor documentation for wait events (Was: pgsql: Add wait event for fsync of WAL segments)

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Refactor documentation for wait events (Was: pgsql: Add wait event for fsync of WAL segments)
Date: 2018-07-17 04:19:49
Message-ID: 20180717041949.GD3388@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 11:22:07AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> This doesn't seem to get rid of the morerows stuff.

The troubling ones are in monitoring.sgml:
<entry morerows="64"><literal>LWLock</literal></entry>
<entry morerows="9"><literal>Lock</literal></entry>
<entry morerows="13"><literal>Activity</literal></entry>
<entry morerows="7"><literal>Client</literal></entry>
<entry morerows="33"><literal>IPC</literal></entry>
<entry morerows="2"><literal>Timeout</literal></entry>
<entry morerows="66"><literal>IO</literal></entry>

And the patch previously sent removes them, but perhaps I am missing
your point?
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-07-17 04:55:25 pgsql: doc: move PARTITION OF stanza to just below PARTITION BY
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-07-17 00:34:46 pgsql: Revise BuildIndexValueDescription to simplify it

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2018-07-17 04:37:52 Re: How to make partitioning scale better for larger numbers of partitions
Previous Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2018-07-17 04:09:23 Re: Let's remove DSM_IMPL_NONE.