From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, John Naylor <jcnaylor(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: missing toast table for pg_policy |
Date: | 2018-07-10 01:16:23 |
Message-ID: | 20180710011623.GG1661@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 02:45:26PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 15.06.18 21:15, Joe Conway wrote:
>> Not surprising -- thanks for the update.
>>
>>> It occurred to be that we could go further and create most toast
>>> tables automatically by taking advantage of the fact that the toast
>>> creation function is a no-op if there are no varlena attributes. The
>>> second patch (applies on top of the first) demonstrates a setup where
>>> only shared and bootstrap catalogs need to have toast declarations
>>> specified manually with fixed OIDs. It's possible this way is more
>>> fragile, though.
>>
>> Hmmm, I'll have a look.
>
> Are you going to provide a new patch soon? This commit fest item is
> otherwise not moving forward.
I am a fan of this patch, so I'd like to help make things move on. Joe,
if you cannot provide a patch, do you mind if I begin to hack my way
around?
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2018-07-10 01:17:27 | Re: Postgres 11 release notes |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-07-10 01:14:35 | Re: [HACKERS] Replication status in logical replication |