Re: Fast default stuff versus pg_upgrade

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Fast default stuff versus pg_upgrade
Date: 2018-06-19 16:52:20
Message-ID: 20180619165220.44auez7ty4cmzh24@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2018-06-19 12:37:52 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > And if the default value bugs us,
> > we can easily add a support function that dumps the value without the
> > anyarray adornment?
>
> The problem here is that that function does not exist in 11beta1.
> Since adding the "incoming" function is certainly going to require
> initdb, we have to be able to dump from the server as it now stands,
> or we'll be cutting existing beta testers adrift.

It'd probably not be too hard to write a plpgsql replacement for it,
should it come to that. Obviously it'd be nicer to not require users to
create that, but ...

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2018-06-19 16:58:37 Re: found xmin from before relfrozenxid on pg_catalog.pg_authid
Previous Message Andres Freund 2018-06-19 16:48:23 Re: WAL prefetch