| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, sfackler(at)gmail(dot)com, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: Supporting tls-server-end-point as SCRAM channel binding for OpenSSL 1.0.0 and 1.0.1 |
| Date: | 2018-06-19 00:19:40 |
| Message-ID: | 20180619001940.GB3314@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Jun 09, 2018 at 09:28:17AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I am still not completely sure what is the correct course of action
> here. Heikki and Peter and not much in favor of adding more complexity
> here as OpenSSL has a long history of having a non-linear history across
> platforms. On the other side, PGDG provides packages down to RHEL6, and
> there are surely servers which use it as backend.
As Peter and Heikki have worked as well on all those features with me,
are there any objection to discard this open item? I looked again at
the patch this morning and it is true that OpenSSL's history makes
things harder, so keeping code consistent and simple with their last LTS
version is appealing.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Langote | 2018-06-19 01:09:44 | Re: Remove mention in docs that foreign keys on partitioned tables are not supported |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-06-19 00:11:20 | Re: pg_config.h.win32 missing a set of flags from pg_config.h.in added in v11 development |